A well-written assignment should demonstrate clear, concise, and logical writing

A well-written assignment should demonstrate clear, concise, and logical writing that effectively communicates ideas. Here are the key elements to a satisfactorily written assignment in this course: 1. Ideas should flow logically from one paragraph to the next. Avoid jumping between ideas without clear transitions. 2. Ensure that each paragraph is focused and contributes to the overall discussion. 3. Use clear and concise language, avoiding ambiguity. Avoid extraneous language, filler words, and repetitive content. 4. Do not replace substantive writing with lists, excessive spacing, or other corner-cutting techniques. 5. Utilize APA-style headings to organize content and make it easier to follow. Headings should be descriptive and reflect the structure of the assignment but should not merely be a copy and paste of the assignment prompt. Use specific examples, evidence, and sources to support arguments and claims. Demonstrate critical thinking by analyzing and synthesizing information, by providing insights, drawing connections between ideas, and offering a well-reasoned discussion. 1. The Washburn et al (2022) article speaks to challenges of integration. Name one and discuss why you think this happens. What similar challenges could you imagine occurring in participatory evaluation? What can you do to mitigate (buffer/reduce) this? 2. What is your reaction to Pham’s (2014) work and assertions about our field? List at least two distinct ideas you are considering.  3. Consider the case study “But Someone Could Die!” How can individuals, families, and groups impacted by these, and similar, issues, be involved in participatory evaluation of programs? Be careful to discuss safety considerations that may exist. https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/overview/model-for-community-change-and-improvement/participatory-evaluation/main